kheru2006 (kheru2006) wrote,
kheru2006
kheru2006

In a fix over classification and rating of CGPA results

I RECENTLY graduated from a local private university with a CGPA of 3.65. I was thrilled with my results as, generally, 3.65 would be considered a first-class honours degree.

But, to my dismay, my university only recognises first-class results as above 3.75 and the students were not informed of this while we were studying.

I was upset and shocked as my friends from other universities claim that their university recognises first-class results as above 3.50. My friends studying abroad also say their universities recognise 3.50 and above as first-class.

Some may say that results don’t matter but I wanted to apply for a scholarship to do post-graduate studies. The organisation offering the scholarship only recognises candidates with a first-class degree.

I wrote an appeal stating that my results were technically first-class but the university rejected my request, explaining that they looked at classification of “classes” and not CGPA per se. So my official classification is second-class.

Some of my classmates who scored the same results were also very upset because they would not be able to convert their PTPTN loans into scholarships.

It’s unfortunate that this matter has been taken lightly and it’s affecting many deserving students who plan to pursue their dream, such as getting jobs and furthering their studies.

Results do matter, and a first-class degree would certainly have more advantages. Some companies only hire first class graduates for certain positions, for example.

So what exactly is the CGPA for first-class honours and why do different universities have different grading methods?

I hope the Government and the Malaysian Qualifications Agency can explain to the thousands of graduates out there who are affected by this. B C Puchong The STAR Home News Letters 7 September 2015

Tags: exam
Subscribe

Posts from This Journal “exam” Tag

  • PT3 puts schools in charge

    I WOULD like to respond to the letter “A mistake to decentralise Form 3 exam” ( The Star, Jan 15) since this matter is of utmost…

  • A mistake to decentralise Form 3 exam

    THE announcement by the Education Ministry to decentralise the Form 3 (PT3) exam starting from 2018 is extremely disappointing news. This policy to…

  • Moving away from exam-oriented mentality

    THE Education Ministry’s decision to not compare states and schools when announcing the Ujian Pencapaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) results on Nov…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments