February 18th, 2010

The Secret

One day, one friend asked another,
"How is it that you are always so happy?
You have so much energy,
and you never seem to get down."

With her eyes smiling, she said,
"I know the Secret!"
"What secret is that?"
To which she replied,
"I'll tell you all about it,
but you have to promise to
share the Secret with others."

"The Secret is this:
I have learned there is little I can do
in my life that will make me truly happy.
I must depend on God to make
me happy and to meet my needs.
When a need arises in my life,
I have to trust God to supply
according to HIS riches.
I have learned most of the time
I don't need half of what I think I do.
He has never let me down.
Since I learned that 'Secret', I am happy."

The questioner's first thought was,
"That's too simple!"
But upon reflecting over her own life
she recalled how she thought a bigger house
would make her happy, but it didn't!
She thought a better paying job
would make her happy, but it hadn't.
When did she realize her greatest happiness?
Sitting on the floor with her grandchildren,
playing games, eating pizza or reading a story,
a simple gift from God.

Now you know it too!
We can't depend on people to make us happy.
Only GOD in His infinite wisdom can do that.
Trust HIM!
And now I pass the Secret on to you!
So once you get it, what will you do?

YOU have to tell someone the Secret, too!
That GOD in His wisdom will take care of YOU!
But it's not really a secret...
We just have to believe it and do it...
Really trust God!



People are unreasonable, illogical, and self-centered.
Love them anyway!

If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish ulterior motives.
Do good anyway!

If you are successful, you will win false friends and true enemies.
Succeed anyway!

The good you do today, will be forgotten tomorrow.
Do good anyway!

Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable.
Be honest and frank anyway!

The biggest person with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest people with the smallest minds;
Think big anyway!

People favor underdogs, but follow only top dogs.
Fight for underdogs anyway!

What you spend years building up may be destroyed overnight.
Build anyway!

People really need help, but will attack you if you help them.
Help them anyway!

Give the world the best you have and it may kick you in the teeth.
Give the world the best you've got anyway!
via " Sharifah"

Malaysian Astronauts --- Just For Laugh!!! ~ Rewind

You might have heard the first one but ............  Wait till you read the second joke.......................
This is a humourous but true reflection of Malaysians.

American Spaceman is called Astronaut
Russian Spaceman is called Cosmonaut
Chinese Spaceman is called Taikonaut
Malaysian Spaceman??? - Can-or-naut

Dr. M  (The Prime Minister) was thinking about sending somebody into space.
Three potential can-or-nauts were called for an interview.
An Indian, a Malay and a Chinese.

Dr. M interviews the Indian first: "So, Muthu, this is a dangerous mission..
How much do you think you should be paid?"
Muthu replied: "One million ringgit."
"Why so much?" asks Dr. M.
"Very dangerous mission, Datuk. Maybe no come back!" replied Muthu.
"That's understandable," says Dr. M.
"Thank you..

Please ask the Malay guy to come here,"
So the Malay walks up, and is asked the same question.
"Alamak!...2 million, Datuk," replied the Malay candidate.
"Two million? That's twice as much!
Even the aneh before you asked for only one million."
"You see, Datuk," explains the Malay,
"I have 4 wives and 15 children.
With 20 of us, it is a big family to support when I am gone...!"
"I see," says Dr. M.
"Okay, can you ask that Chinese guy to come in then?"

The Chinese guy comes in and Dr. M asks, "Ah Chong, given this is a very risky mission, how much do you want?" Ah Chong thinks for a while, and says, "3 million."
Mahathir appears shocked. "What! 3 million? Why so much?"
Ah Chong beckons Dr. M to come closer.
He quietly whispers into his ear,
"Datuk, one million you keep, one million
I keep, and then one more million to send that aneh into space lah!" 

  1 Malaysia !


An Indian, a Chinese and a Malay were in a terrible car accident.
They were all brought to the same emergency room, but all of them died.
Just as they were about to put the toe tag on the Chinese, he stirred and opened his eyes.

Astonished, the doctors and nurses present, asked him what happened. 
"Well," said the Chinese, "I remember the crash, and then there was a beautiful light,   and then the Indian and the Malay and I were standing at the gates of heaven.

An Angel approached us and said that we were too young to die, and that for a donation of RM 500, we could return to earth. So, of course I pulled out my wallet and gave him the RM500.00 and the next thing I knew I was back here." 

"That's amazing!" said one of the doctors.   "But what happened to the other two?" 
"Last I saw them" replied the Chinese,   "the Indian was bargaining over the price, and the Malay was waiting for the government to pay for his."

via  "Sharifah Khatijah Syed Abdul Rahman Al-Attas"

Speech by Michael Danby on Anwar


Speech by Michael Danby,
Federal Member for Melbourne Ports and Chair of the Australian Parliamentary sub-committee on Foreign Affairs

This trial, like the first trial of Anwar Ibrahim, is a disgrace to Malaysia, a country that aspires to democratic norms, where parties change power peacefully and political opponents are not persecuted by organs of the state. Perverting the legal system for political ends by charging Anwar with sexual offences is an affront to human rights. - Michael Danby

Tonight, I want to speak out on behalf of fellow democrats around Asia, who are flabbergasted at events unfolding in Kuala Lumpur. I refer to the trial which began today of the Malaysian Opposition Leader, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. For the second time, the Malaysian leader of the Opposition, Anwar Ibrahim is on trial for what they call in ancient grating English, ‘Sodomy’. For the second time, the Malaysian legal system is being manipulated by supporters of the incumbent government to drive Malaysia’s best known leader Anwar Ibrahim out of national politics. For the second time, documents are being forged, witnesses are being coerced, evidence is being fabricated.

This trial, like the first trial of Anwar Ibrahim, is a disgrace to Malaysia, a country that aspires to democratic norms, where parties change power peacefully and political opponents are not persecuted by organs of the state. Perverting the legal system for political ends by charging Anwar with sexual offences is an affront to human rights. In the first place, the offences with which Anwar has been charged that should not be on the statute book. Australia abolished its laws punishing consenting adult homosexual acts decades ago, as did most advanced countries. It’s long past time that Malaysia also repealed these laws, which it inherited from British colonial times. If these laws did not exist, they could not be used for political purposes as we are currently seeing.

In the second place, everyone in Malaysia, and everyone in the international legal community, knows that Anwar is innocent of these charges. This week the Wall Street Journal published a first-hand account of how the Malaysian Special Branch police fabricated the charges that led to Anwar’s first trial in 1998. Munawar Anees recalled how he had been starved and beaten into signing a false confession which implicated Anwar. Now it’s happening again. These are the lengths to which the corrupt elements within the Malaysian ruling party are willing to go to frame Anwar and remove his threat to their power.

Malaysia is a long-time friend and ally of Australia. Over the past 40 years Malaysia has become an increasingly prosperous and successful multi-cultural society. We continue our friendly and mutually beneficial relationship with Malaysia, which is a deep economic, strategic and cultural relationship.

But Malaysia is also a country of 28 million people who have lived ever since independence more than 50 years ago under the rule of the same party, the United Malay National Organisation or UMNO. UMNO has stayed in power by playing on the Malay fears of the Chinese and Indian minorities. So long as Malaysian politics were polarised  even subtlety along racial lines, so long as the Malays voted loyally for UMNO, then the self-perpetuating UMNO oligarchy, who have grown rich through long years of power and through their cozy links to business, would be safe.

That’s why Anwar Ibrahim is such a threat. For the first time Malaysia has a charismatic Malay opposition politician able to appeal to Malay voters and pose a real threat to UMNO’s hold on power. At the 2008 elections Anwar’s People’s Justice Party and its allies won 60 seats away from UMNO and its allies, creating a viable two-party system for the first time. As a result, Abdullah Badawi was deposed as Prime Minister and replaced by Najib Razak, but the threat from Anwar’s coalition continues to grow. So even though the first attempt to frame Anwar on these spurious charged had failed, the corrupt forces within UMNO have decided to try again.

I recently had the privilege of meeting Anwar Ibrahim when he was in Melbourne for the Parliament of the World’s Religions in December. He is an intelligent and articulate and passionate democrat. He is committed to a thorough reform of Malaysian government, to rid it of the cronyism, corruption and authoritarian tendencies that have gained ground since Mahathir Mohammed became Prime Minister in 1981. He is a great, although not uncritical, friend and admirer of Australia. If he were to become Malaysia’s Prime Minister our relationship with Malaysia would become even stronger.

I am pleased that in the last few hours the judge has suspended the case against Anwar for a day. I hope Prime Minister Najib and his ministers are not involved. The best way for them to prove that they are not is to intervene and have these charges withdrawn, and those responsible for fabricating them punished. Malaysia is a great country, and an emerging power in our region. It can do without the embarrassment that these disgraceful proceedings are undermining its newly won democratic credibility.


Look Up Your Birthday


January 01 - 09 ~ Bird
January 10 - 24 ~ Slug
January 25 - 31 ~ Cockroach

February 01 - 05 ~ Parasite
February 06 - 14 ~ Bullfrog
February 15 - 21 ~ Skunk
February 22 - 28 ~ Snake

March 01 - 12 ~ Ape
March 13 - 15 ~ Cockroach
March 16 - 23 ~ Slug
March 24 - 31 ~ Parasite

April 01 - 03 ~ Bird
April 04 - 14 ~ Snake
April 15 - 26 ~ Slug
April 27 - 30 ~ Skunk

May 01 - 13 ~ Slug
May 14 - 21 ~ Bullfrog
May 22 - 31 ~ Cockroach

June 01 - 03 ~ Slug
June 04 - 14 ~ Skunk
June 15 - 20 ~ Bird
June 21 - 24 ~ Ape
June 25 - 30 ~ Parasite

July 01 - 09 ~ Slug
July 10 - 15 ~ Bird
July 16 - 26 ~ Bullfrog
July 27 - 31 ~ Parasite

August 01 - 15 ~ Ape
August 16 - 25 ~ Slug
August 26 - 31 ~ Skunk

September 01 - 14 ~ Bullfrog
September 15 - 27 ~ Parasite
September 28 - 30 ~ Bird

October 01 - 15 ~ Ape
October 16 - 27 ~ Skunk
October 28 - 31 ~ Snake

November 01 - 16 ~ Cockroach
November 17 - 30 ~ Parasite

December 01 - 16 ~ Bird
December 17 - 25 ~ Ape
December 26 - 31 ~ Bullfrog

If you are a Bird : A very loyal and sweet person. Your loyalty can never be doubted. You are quite honest and sincere when it comes to your attitude towards working. You are a very simple person, indeed. Absolutely hassle free, humble and down-to-earth! ! That explains the reason why your friends cling on to you! You have a good taste for clothes. If your wardrobe is not updated with what is trendy, you sure are depressed. Popular and easy-going. You have a little group of dignified friends, all of th em being quality-personified .

If you are a
Slug : Always up to some sort of a mischief! The mischievous gleam in your eyes is what makes you so cute and attractive to everyone. You are an extremely fun-to-be-with kind of person. No wonder people seek for your company and look forward to include you for all get-together's. However, you are sensitive which is a drawback. People need to select their words while talking to you. If someone tries to fiddle around and play with words while dealing with you, it is enough to invite your wrath. God bless the person then!

If you are a
Cockroach : Quite contradictory to your name, you are a peace loving person.. You best try to avoid a situation wherein you are required to fight.. An outdoor person, you disl ike sitting at one place for a long duration. You are a born leader, and have it in you how to tactfully derive work from people. You love being loved, and when you receive your share of limelight from someone, you are all theirs!!!! Well, well... Hence some people could even take an advantage, flatter you to the maximum and get their work done. So be careful.....

If you are a
Parasite : An extremely lovable, adorable person, sometimes shy, with a passion for quick wit. At times, you prefer quietness. You love exploring various things and going into depth of each thing. Under normal circumstances you're cool but when given a reason to, you are like a volcano waiting to erupt. You're a fashion bird. People look forward to you as an icon associated with fashion. Basically, you mingle along freely but don't like talking much to strangers. People feel very easy in your company. You observe care in choosing your friends.

If you are a Skunk
: You are near to perfect and nice at heart. The examples of your kindness are always circulated in groups of people. You, too, love peace. You wouldn't like to retaliate even to a person who is in the wrong. You are loved due to this. You do not wish to talk behind one's back. People love the way you always treat them. You can give, give and give love, and the best part is that you do not expect it back in return. You are generous enough. Seeing things in a practical light is what remains the best trait of you guys.

If you are a
: You symbolize a very happy-go-lucky approach in life. Whatever the surroundings may be, grim or cheerful, you remain unaffected. In fact, you spread cheer wherever you go. You are the leader of your group of friends and good at consoling people in their times of need. You dislike hypocrisy and tend to shirk away from hypocrites. They can never be in your good books, no matter what. You are very methodical and organized in your work. No amount of mess, hence, can ever encompass you. Beware; it is easy for you to fall in love....

If you are a
: You are mysterious. You are someone who can handle pressure with ease, and can handle any atmosphere without going berserk. You can be mean at times, and love to gossip with your selected group. Very prim and proper. You like all situations and things to be in the way you desire, which, sometimes is not possible. As a result, you may lose out in some relationships. But otherwise, you love to help people out from difficult and tight spots when they really need you.

If you are a
: Very impatient and hyper!!! You want things to be done as quick as possible. At heart, you are quite simple and love if you are the centre of attraction. That way, you people are unique. You would like to keep yourself safe from all the angles. Shall your name be dragged or featured in any sort of a controversy, you then go all panicky. Therefore, you take your precautions from the very beginning. When you foresee anything wrong, your sixth sense is what saves you from falling in traps. Quite a money minded bunch you people are!!

  But I'm neither of those , I'm human ...toing, toing, toing !
via "Atie Fakharuzzaman"

Anwar - Mangsa Pedakwaan Yang Rakus


Feb 9 - Telah hampir 16 tahun saya berkhidmat sebagai seorang peguamcara jenayah. Sepanjang tempoh ini, pengalaman saya boleh dikatakan cukup luas dalam membela orang tertuduh dalam kes-kes jenayah salahlaku seks. Suatu yang agak nyata dari pengalaman saya, pihak berkuasa tidak akan sama sekali membuat pendakwaan jika bukti perubatan tidak berpihak kepada mereka. Ianya seakan suatu peraturan - atau syarat sah dalam bidang perundangan bagi kes-kes rogol mahupun kes liwat - bukti perubatan adalah merupakan oksigen kepada pihak pendakwa.

Dari pengamatan saya, peraturan atau syarat sah tersebut tidak langsung digunapakai dalam perbicaraan Fitnah 2 Anwar Ibrahim yang sedang berlangsung. Apabila si tertuduh itu adalah Anwar Ibrahim, maka peraturan yang ada akan terus bertukar secara drastik dengan tiba-tiba. Apabila yang didakwa adalah Anwar Ibrahim, pihak pendakwa tidak lagi perlu mengukur keupayaan mereka terhadap kes mengikut bukti-bukti yang ada. Apabila yang dibicarakan adalah Anwar Ibrahim, pihak pendakwa - tidak akan memperdulikan apa pun yang berlaku, akan terus meneruskan pendakwaan dan perbicaraan tanpa mengambil kisah samada dengan kelemahan bukti yang ada mahupun langsung ketiadaan bukti!!

Satu-satunya jenayah yang telah Anwar lakukan dalam kes Fitnah 2 ini adalah kerana namanya Anwar Ibrahim.

Saya percaya jika si tertuduh itu bernama Ibrahim Anwar atau mana-mana Ibrahim sekalipun yang didakwa meliwat Saiful, pihak berkuasa tidak akan mendakwa si tertuduh itu berdasarkan bukti laporan perubatan yang disediakan oleh para doktor dari kedua-dua Pusat Rawatan Islam (PUSRAWI) dan juga dari Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL).

Kedua-dua laporan tersebut, seperti yang dinyatakan kepada saya oleh barisan peguam Anwar mengandungi bukti secara jelas dan nyata yang tidak berpihak kepada pihak pendakwa, iaitu pengesahan bahawa tiada langsung kesan kemasukan yang zahir (no visible penetration) pada dubur Saiful. Malah, laporan Hospital Kuala Lumpur telah disahkan dan ditandatangani oleh tiga orang pakar perubatan. Maka, laporan-laporan perubatan yang ada di dalam tangan pihak pendakwa sekarang merupakan hasil laporan yang disahkan oleh empat orang pakar perubatan (satu dari PUSRAWI dan tiga dari HKL) yang menafikan teori pihak pendakwa bahawa Saiful telah diliwat oleh Anwar.

Persoalan yang ditimbulkan kepada Peguam Negara adalah, walaupun dengan terdapatnya bukti-bukti yang cukup jelas dan nyata ini, mengapa pihak pendakwa berkeras untuk meneruskan pendakwaan terhadap Anwar? Jawabannya cukup jelas, ianya adalah kerana si tertuduh adalah Anwar Ibrahim. Apabila yang dibicarakan itu adalah Anwar Ibrahim, biar pun ada beratus-ratus laporan perubatan yang membebaskan Anwar pihak pendakwa tidak akan ambil peduli.

Bagi kebanyakan orang, persoalan ini pastinya akan timbul di benak kepala. Adakah bukti perubatan ini penting dan signifikan dalam perbicaraan Anwar? Jawaban kepada persoalan ini adalah jelas dan nyata - ya, ia penting dan signifikan. Seperti yang telah saya nyatakan di atas, bukti perubatan (dalam kes-kes jenayah salahlaku seks) merupakan oksigen kepada kes pihak pendakwa. Apabila ketiadaan atau berlaku kerosakan kepada bekalan oksigen ini, kes-kes pihak pendakwa akan terbantut dan mati.

Bagi kes-kes jenayah salahlaku seks, peraturan perundangan (rule of prudence) seperti yang diamalkan oleh peguamcara dan peguambela - bukti dari keterangan pengadu sahaja sememangnya tidak memadai. Bukti tersebut haruslah disokong dan disahihkan (corroborated) oleh lain-lain bukti yang bebas (independent evidence).

Jika dipakaikan di dalam perbicaraan Anwar, bukti keterangan Saiful sahaja sememangnya tidak mencukupi untuk membolehkan Anwar didapati bersalah. Bukti keterangan Saiful harus disokong dan disahihkan (dengan lain-lain bukti). Tidak semua kes-kes jenayah memerlukan bukti sokongan dan bukti sahih. Tetapi, bagi kes-kes jenayah salahlaku seks, pembuktian sokongan adalah amat penting untuk menyokong wujudnya perlakuan liwat seperti yang didakwa.

Mengapa perlu adanya pembuktian sokongan bagi kes-kes jenayah salahlaku seks? Pengamal perundangan bersetuju bahawa ianya perlu kerana jenis dan sifat kesalahan salahlaku seks itu sendiri. Dalam mana-mana kes rogol atau liwat, adalah cukup mudah untuk seseorang itu dituduh oleh seorang yang lain, tetapi sebaliknya adalah amat sukar untuk orang yang dituduh untuk menafikan tuduhan tersebut.

Dengan begitu jelas telah dapat kita lihat walaupun sebelum mahkamah menjatuhkan sebarang hukuman terhadap Anwar, bahawa berdasarkan liputan media yang dibuat oleh Utusan dan lain-lain media kepunyaan BN, Anwar telahpun dihukum bersalah oleh juri-juri ini. Liputan media tersebut berniat cukup jahat dan membuatkan orang tertanya-tanya, samada maruah Anwar mahupun ahli keluarganya diambilkira oleh media-media yang tidak bertanggungjawab ini.

Undang-undang yang ada dengan jelas mengatakan bahawa jika anda menuduh seseorang meliwat anda, anda dikehendaki memberi bukti sokongan dan bukti sahih untuk menyokong tuduhan anda. Kerana itulah dalam undang-undang jenayah Islam apabila seseorang dituduh melakukan liwat, pihak pendakwa wajib untuk memiliki empat orang saksi yang secara nyata melihat kemasukan (ke dalam dubur mangsa). Ini menunjukkan Islam begitu mengambil berat akan pembuktian sokongan.

Di dalam undang-undang Islam juga, tahap pembuktian dalam kes-kes liwat adalah amat tinggi sehinggakan pihak pendakwa harus membuktikan pertuduhan mereka dengan jelas dan langsung tanpa sebarang syak mahupun wasangka manakala tahap pembuktian dalam undang-undang sivil pula hanya memerlukan tanpa sebarang wasangka yang munasabah (beyond reasonable doubt). Maka dalam Islam, sebarang wasangka walaupun sekelumit mana akan memihak kepada si tertuduh berdasarkan kepada pernyataan bahawa “kesalahan hudud akan dihentikan (pendakwaannya) bilamana wujud syak dan wasangka walaupun sedikit”. Islam berpandangan bahawa adalah lebih baik jika seseorang hakim itu tersilap dalam membebaskan 10 orang yang bersalah dari tersilap menghukum walau seorang yang sebenarnya tidak bersalah.

Dalam sebarang kesalahan meliwat, seperti juga kesalahan merogol, elemen utama yang amat perlu dibuktikan oleh pihak pendakwa adalah perbuatan kemasukan (ke dalam dubur atau faraj) itu sendiri. Dalam perundangan Islam juga, elemen yang serupa juga perlu dibuktikan oleh pihak pendakwa dengan terang dan jelas.

Jadi, bagaimana boleh pihak pendakwa membuktikan wujud elemen kemasukan jika mereka tidak mengeluarkan bukti-bukti laporan perubatan (di mahkamah?) Dan apalah gunanya bukti-bukti laporan perubatan itu kepada pihak pendakwa jika ia secara terang menyatakan bahawa tiada kesan kemasukan ke dalam dubur Saiful? Bukti-bukti laporan perubatan sepatutnya menjadi pembuktian sokongan kepada bukti keterangan Saiful tetapi dalam kes ini, bukti-bukti laporan perubatan yang sama sebenarnya membebaskan Anwar dari pertuduhan yang ada. Peraturannya amat mudah sekali: tiada kemasukan, tiada pertuduhan. Tetapi pejabat Peguam Negara seolah-olah berpendapat bahawa, ya, benar tiada kemasukan tetapi pertuduhan akan tetap diteruskan!!

Semestinya jika Anwar dibicarakan di bawah undang-undang Islam, pertuduhan yang difitnahkan terhadapnya tentunya tidak akan diteruskan. Melihat kepada keterangan Saiful di mahkamah setakat ini, umum pasti akan akan merumuskan bahawa pertuduhan yang dikenakan itu sememangnya langsung tidak berasas atau hanya fitnah jahat semata.

Peguam Negara sepatutnya menunjukkan tahap profesionalisma dan integriti yang tinggi dalam kes Anwar ini. Kejujuran intelek mewajibkan pihak pendakwa untuk menarik balik pendakwaan terhadap Anwar Ibrahim. Cukup. Menuduh seseorang tanpa bukti-bukti yang jelas merupakan suatu kesalahan pendakwaan dan pembaziran wang rakyat.

Episod Peguam Negara dijadikan alat kepada ahli politik yang jahat dan zalim sepatutnya telah berlalu selepas tsunami pilihanraya 2008.


Mohamed Hanipa Maidin merupakan Ahli Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat dan Penasihat Undang-Undang PAS. Beliau juga adalah seorang peguam yang berpengalaman dan berblog di peguampas.blogspot.com

via "SABAK BT4"

Kisah Lucu Dari Terengganu

Dilema Mamat Ganu....salah pahang ; kisoh-kisoh ning kisoh menawok saje , tidak berniat menyinggung perasaang kawan-kawang dari negeri Ganung kite ... jangang maghog nehh awang ngang mek-mek ...

Kisah Lucu Dari Terengganu


There was this one family of terengganu people nak balik raye and they were stuffed into one kancil. seven of the family members all together, so the mum said,
mum : guane nih.. penoh kete. dok muak ayoh mu wey!
dad : betul jugok. guane nok buak nih? lame nok sapa kapong.
mum : tujuh oghang dokleh sumbak masuk kete kancil nih. Kecik do'oh.
They then thought and thought of the solution to their problem and how to make some space in the car. Suddenly their youngest son shouted..
son : abah... umi.. awang tau doh guane nok buak..kite skaghang ade tujuh oghang.tamboh la soghang lagi. Baru jadik 'lapang'... hehehehe.


Abu nih org Trengganu, manakala Amer ni org Kedah. Tinggal satu bilik..katil double decker.. Amer kat atas.. Abu kat bawah. Amer ni suker baca majalah dan komik.. si Abu lak suka pinjam.. belinya tidak. So, Amer ader sedikit bengang ler kat Abu ni.
Kekadang.. majalah yg baru beli dan tak sempat nak baca lagi pun Abu dah kebas baca dulu.. bila kasi balik dah lasam dah.. tension Amer.
One day, Amer balik dari outing dan beli majalah UJANG. Siap cover tak kasi Abu ni nampak. Lepas basuh baju, kemas sedikit sebanyak dan siapkan homework.. dia pun nak rilek ler kat atas katil. Majalah UJANG bawah tilam pun dia bawa keluar. Elok jer dia baring.. baru buka mukasurat pertama.. Abu kat bawah dia bersuara.. " Amer.. nok ujang.."
"Nanti la jap.. aku baru jer nak baca.." jawab lembut jer Amer.. "Ameer.. nok ujang tu" Abu tak putus asa. " Nanti la dulu.. bagi la aku baca dulu.. nanti abih aku bagi kat hang laa!" panas sikit Amer. "Amer ! Nok ujang !! " Suara Abu sedikit keras. "Hang ni dah melampau.. kalau nak beli sendiri la.. apa.. hang ingat aku beli UJANG ni dengan duit bapak hang ka??" Amer dah naik angin.. siap turun dari katil dia dah. "Laaa.. aku kata tu.. haghi nok ujang tu.. mung basuh kaing.. kekgi basoh.." kecut jer Abu jawab...
Drummmmmm.. hujan pun turun dengan lebat.. Baju Amer kat ampaian pun basah kembali..

kalu nok maghoh gok, maghoh awang ning ... "SABAK BT4"