APRIL 28 — A few weeks ago I attended a public event where a representative from the Ministry of Education gave a powerful and passionate speech about the Malaysian Education Blueprint. One statement really caught my attention: the fact that globally 70 per cent of countries embarking on education reform fail miserably.
The thing that I personally find interesting about the recent wave of global reforms is that the strategies being used by the majority of the reforming countries (successful and unsuccessful reformers alike) are remarkably similar. They involve rolling out a standardised set of education policies related to teacher training; curriculum reform; uniform and regular student assessment; teacher accountability measures; and decentralisation. Malaysia’s Education Blueprint has also drawn heavily from this playbook.
At first sight it seems a major conundrum that many countries are adopting the same education policies and that some are achieving liftoff, whilst others are crashing spectacularly back to earth. We obviously need to unpick this carefully to make sure Malaysia is a success story.
Back in 1974 the Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman told the story of Tanna Island in the pacific, during World War II. A small population of indigenous islanders witnessed thousands of US troops land en-mass with vast amounts of military equipment and supplies. When the war ended, the military abandoned the airbases and stopped dropping the cargo. The islanders were utterly distraught and longed for the now missing supplies.
They undertook their own in-house ‘management consultancy’ and concluded that if they could replicate the conditions that existed when the Americans were on the island, the cargo would start being airdropped again. They set about creating runways, picked their strongest men to march up and down these ‘airbases’ and fashioned radio headphones from coconuts. One islander donned the ‘headphones’ and played the role of air traffic controller, guiding the planes in.
The Tanna Islanders successfully replicated most of the features of island life during the American occupation but unsurprisingly the planes still didn’t come back. Feynman called the phenomenon Cargo Cult Science, which has become a widely used term to describe situations were organisations try to make improvements by copying the features of another successful reference group but they get it spectacularly wrong – by focusing only on the irrelevant features.
I think there are education reform parallels to this story and maybe even a few countries that have gone down the path of cargo cult education reform. It would explain why so many countries adopt similar reform policies with varying degrees of success – because there is some other hidden wiring in the strategies of successful reformers that seriously gets lost in translation. It’s really important that Malaysia avoids this.
In CfTB’s experience, one of the common reasons for failure in Cargo Cult Education is that the reforms stop at the classroom door. Everything gets reformed, except the micro interactions between student and teacher inside the classroom. But it’s easy to understand why policymakers focus their reform efforts outside the classroom. Things like changing class sizes, the content of exams, the written curriculum, school facilities or the terms and conditions of teachers are a lot easier to achieve than the mindset shift of a single teacher.
Unless policymakers focus on the hidden wiring of the teacher-student relationship and identify the smallest number of high impact initiatives to improve this, reform is unlikely to be successful. Granted, the school buildings will look nice, the curriculum documents will stand up to international scrutiny and the exam system will have been overhauled but the hidden wiring will remain completely untouched. All that will have happened is that like the Tanna Islanders, the education reformers will have built something that looks a bit like a high performing school system but that has none of the really essential features.
So how do we avoid the Cargo Cult approach to access the hidden wiring of Malaysia’s education system and reform it? CfBT Education Malaysia has undertaken a major research project to commemorate our 35th Anniversary and here are five things we uncovered that have value for Malaysia’s reform agenda.
First, telling teachers what to do usually does not work. Improving their practice involves changing their habits and their engrained repertoire of teaching strategies, which is hard. It is not so hard to get new ideas into teachers’ heads about effective approaches to teaching and learning. The problem is that old habits are hard to break and it takes time for new ideas to crowd out the existing repertoire. It can be done but it certainly does not happen ‘naturally’.
Second, the key to improving teacher quality is to improve the quality of Continuous Professional Development (CPD). This means moving away from traditional in-service training models where teachers attend workshops and then return to school. The Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve tells us that just 20 minutes after a traditional training programme has concluded a teacher will have forgotten 42 per cent of what the trainer said. After 31 days, they will only remember 21 per cent and they are only likely to put 10 per cent into practice. This is not a strong return on investment.
Third, the best way to improve the quality of CPD is to base it in the classroom, through a mixture of coaching and teacher learning communities. The cycle involves teachers undertaking training in a new pedagogical approach, making the commitment to trial it in their class and being observed doing so by pedagogy coaches, who provide feedback. Aligned to this, teacher learning communities allow educators to share their experiences and strategies for overcoming challenges. This cycle of reinforcement and the look of enjoyment on the faces of the students will gradually result in the new approaches crowding out the old.
Fourth, it also requires teachers to make a commitment to reflect, continually improve and only focus on what makes a difference to student learning. Leaders also need to make a commitment to create a culture of expectation for improved practice. The focus of school leaders must be on making a difference to students and in providing the time, trust and moral and practical support to enable teachers to experiment and innovate without fear.
Finally, policymakers must acknowledge that the hidden wiring is key. Changing this alone will transform the quality of education, even if all the other areas are left untouched – because they are just Education Cargo Cults, like the Tanna Island runways, which have the style of fundamental reform but none of the substance. — CfBT Education Malaysia
* Dr Arran Hamilton is Director of CfBT Education Malaysia (www.cfbt.com.my), a not-for-profit organisation founded in 1979.
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malay Mail Online.Dr Arran Hamilton The Malaymail Opinion What you think April 28, 2014